Monday, June 17, 2013

Tony Awards 2013 (Part II: Musical Revivals)

I'm not going to lie, the revivals were AWESOME this year!  In my opinion, we had a stronger set of revivals than we did original shows.  All of these revivals were inventive, creative, and (with the exception of Annie) timely.  They had some brilliant casts, some inspired creative decisions, and some incredibly entertaining performances!  Don't believe me?  See for yourself!

AND THE NOMINEES FOR BEST REVIVAL OF A MUSICAL ARE:
Annie:
Ok, so, for those of you who were wondering, yes I do have a soul, I'm not a horrible vicious person, and I am beginning to feel a little bad for "hating" on Annie so much.  When I sat down and thought about it and watched Annie's Tony performance, I began to realize that the show really was put together very well.  It was well casted, well staged, and is generally a great show.  I have nothing against any of the actors or creative team, I thought they all did excellent!  The problem is, I just don't feel like there was a need to revive this show on Broadway.  I once read an article that said that, when you take out long-running shows (like The Lion King and "Phantom") and theaters only big enough for plays, there's only around 10 Broadway theaters open for new musicals to perform in.  This means that even good shows have to close prematurely, not because they're not making money, but because the theater is needed for a "better prospect."  With shows like Chaplin and The Mystery of Edwin Drood closing (at least partially) to make room for the next show coming in, I feel like Annie is just taking up space that Broadway doesn't have.  I mean, obviously it's doing fairly well since (as far as I know) it hasn't announced a closing date yet, but I feel like it's not worth the space it takes up.  Now, I actually feel this way about several shows (such as Rock of Ages and Jersey Boys) because I feel like they had their run and now it's time for them to move on.  What's special about Annie is that it's not a long running show, it's a (fairly recent) revival.  So why do I feel like it's "had it's run"? Because it's SO much like the original!!!   And what's more, everybody remembers the original!  It's not like Pippin where they took the show in a COMPLETELY different direction, or like The Mystery of Edwin Drood where they revived a show long since forgotten in the Broadway vault.  8 shows a week they don't surprise anybody and give a performance of the exact same Annie that people have had memorized for years.  Personally, I consider that an injustice, especially when new shows like Tuck Everlasting and Big Fish are being delayed because of theater availability.  Ok, enough ranting about that, onto their performance.  I actually really liked their performance.  I didn't understand why all the orphans had Brooklyn accents (but it's better than randomly giving them cockney accents, which I have seen before and makes even less sense), but aside from that I thought it was a solid performance.  The girls did really good, and then Jane Lynch comes out and blew me away!  I mean, I wasn't sure what to expect when she came out, but she definitely delivered (as soon as the performance I informed all my Tony Party guests "See what can happen when you leave Glee?!").  In my opinion, her performance is a strong argument for adding a "best replacement" category.  I am disappointed we didn't get to see Anthony Warlow (Daddy Warbucks) perform, but aside from that I thought the performance was great!  Do you agree?:
Annie was nominated for 1 Award and it did not win.
  • Best Revival of a Musical - nominated
Let's be honest, everybody kind of knew Annie wouldn't win.  I think the reason it wasn't nominated for anything else was because the categories it was strongest in (Anthony Warlow for Leading actor, Lila Crawford for leading actress, etc.) were all really strong categories.  So, once again, what killed Annie was timing.

The Mystery of Edwin Drood
I think it's no secret that I absolutely love "Drood" and I especially love this production!  They assembled a remarkably talented group of actors, had a really clever creative team, and it's just a darn good show!  I came across the show by watching some nominees in the Jimmy Awards, and I must say it has quickly risen to the status of one of my favorite shows.  The book is just SO clever!!!   The characters are vibrant, the dialogue witty, the plot "twisty" and the music...well, the music isn't the best, but it can still be quite catchy.  But what made this production really shine was the fact that they assembled such a BRILLIANT cast to be in this character driven show.  Ok, I'm going to give a long and wordy cast list, know that I had heard of each and everyone of these actors before they were in this show....that's how good this cast is!  Will Chase [RENT: Filmed Live on Broadway, Miss Saigon (replacement)], Stephanie J. Block [The Pirate Queen, 9 to 5], Jessie Mueller [On a Clear Day You Can See Forever, Into the Woods (Shakespeare in the Park)], Jim Norton [The Seafarer, Finnian's Rainbow (2009 Revival)], Andy Karl [Altar Boyz (Off-Broadway), Legally Blonde], Betsy Wolfe [Everyday Rapture, The Last Five Years (Off Broadway 2013 Revival)], and the legendary Chita Rivera [West Side Story, Bye Bye Birdie, Kiss of the Spider Woman].  Are you as impressed as I am?  Well you should be!  This ensemble was freakishly strong and they worked SO well together! I'm so sad the show had to close as soon as it did, but I am really glad that so many of the actors already have new shows lined up.  Unfortunately, since the show was closed and the producer's didn't want to pay for a slot, "Drood" wasn't able to perform at the TONY's (which outraged me).  However, they did give it some tribute by at least playing a highlight montage from the show.  Unfortunately, I can't find that montage on Youtube.  I did find another montage (this one's even a bit longer) but for some reason it wouldn't allow me to post the video on this page.  So just click here to be taken straight to the Youtube Link.

The Mystery of Edwin Drood was nominated for 5 Awards and did not win any.
  • Best Revival of a Musical - nominated
  • Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Musical (Stephanie J. Block) - nominated
  • Best Performance by an Actor in a Featured Role in a Musical (Will Chase) - nominated
  • Best Direction of a Musical (Scott Ellis) - nominated
  • Best Scenic Design of a Musical (Anna Louizos) - nominated
This is really a tough one, because I kind of agree in every individual category that "Drood" should've lost, but on the whole I'm not happy with the fact that it didn't win anything.  I think the best chance it had was in best supporting actor (because Will Chase did a superb job), but I'm honestly not that disappointed that Gabriel Ebert won.  I wish that this could've been called a "Tony Award Winning Production" because it was outstanding, but the competition was just too high this year.

Pippin
I'm not going to lie, Pippin is my favorite production of the season.  It is the perfect example of taking good content and making it an even better show.  Obviously a ton of the success of the show can be given to it's original creators (Steven Schwartz and Bob Fosse especially), and of course the cast of this production (led by Patina Miller, Mathew Thomas, and Andrea Martin) share a lot of the credit as well.  But the MVP of this show is without a doubt director Diane Paulus!  She transformed this from a good show into a spectacle and, in my opinion, is the reason this show came out such a big winner at the awards.  I don't know if any plans of a tour have been announced yet (I feel like it'd be hard to tour with a show this huge and complicated) but I certainly hope that it at least runs for a long time, because I think as many people as possible need to see this production!  With all this in mind, it won't come as a huge surprise that Pippin had my favorite show performance of the evening.  I had even seen both of those songs before on various talk shows and I still ate up every second of it!  I just love the way that everything from the sweet solo moments like "Corner of the Sky", to the massive ensemble moments where there's a hundred different things going on like in "Magic To Do", Pippin finds away to be stunning!  I have little doubt you'll love this video as much as I did!  Behold (I apologize for the unfortunate thumbnail):
Pippin was nominated for 10 Awards and won 4.
  • Best Revival of a Musical - WINNER
  • Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Musical (Patina Miller) - WINNER
  • Best Performance by an Actor in a Featured Role in a Musical (Terrence Mann) - nominated
  • Best Performance by an Actres in a Featured Role in a Musical (Andrea Martin) - WINNER
  • Best Direction of a Musical (Diane Paulus) - WINNER
  • Best Choreography (Chet Walker) - nominated
  • Best Scenic Design of a Musical (Scott Pask) - nominated
  • Best Costume Design of a Musical (Dominique Lemieux) - nominated
  • Best Lighting Design of a Musical (Kenneth Posner) - nominated
  • Best Sound Design of a Musical (Jonathan Deans & Garth Helm) - nominated
There were not many surprises here.  Even though the design of the whole show was brilliant, it really would've had a hard time competing with Matilda, Cinderella, and the other powerhouses in the design categories.  I knew that Pippin would win Best Revival and I think everyone (who was paying attention) knew that Andrea Martin would win best Featured Actress.  In hindsight, I should've known that Diane Paulus would win Best Director (apparently everyone else did).  But the one that I think nobody saw coming was Patina Miller.  Everybody knew that would be a tight race, but just about everything I read (including my own judgement) gave the edge to Laura Osnes.  Now, I'm not disappointed that Patina won, I think she was fabulous in the role, but it did make for one of the biggest shocks of the evening!  But something pretty cool came from it, once again, Tony history was made.  This is the first time in history that both a man and a woman have won Tony's for playing the same role (as you can imagine, it doesn't come up often).   So all in all, Pippin came out really well, and I'm really thrilled for that!

Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella
I'm afraid that perhaps I didn't give "Cinderella" it's fair due.   Since I never really liked the original Disney movie, and all the live productions I'd ever seen (including one I was in) didn't really do much for me.  However, throughout my Tony research and the Awards themselves have made me think perhaps this is a truly excellent show.  It definitely has a stellar cast (led by Laura Osnes [Bonnie & Clyde, Grease (2007 Revival)], Santino Fontana [Billy Elliot, The Importance of Being Earnest (2011 Revival)], and Victoria Clark [Titanic, Sister Act]) and they have a way (like any good revival) of making even an old score really come alive!  What's more, I'm beginning to see how fabulous the technical aspects of the show are.  The costumes especially are pretty breathtaking (Cinderella's costume change was one of the best moments of the night in my opinion).  So, although I might not just dive into the show, I think perhaps I should give it more of a chance, because it does seem to have merit.  I can definitely say that it's Tony performance was pretty great!  They conveniently chose to do a medley of the only three songs I had heard from the show, so that made me feel nice and I looked more informed than I actually was.  All in all the performance was excellent!  They did a wonderful job of highlighting each of their stars and the show's strengths.  In addition, it included a pretty great ball room dance sequence (that, as my party guests pointed out, includes some look-a-likes to Disney princesses).  I think it's the performance that I like the best without expecting to.  Take a look (sorry about how it begins, you have to skip ahead a bit to get to the performance):
Rodger's + Hammerstein's Cinderella was nominated for 9 Awards and won 1.
  • Best Book of a Musical (Douglas Carter Beane) - nominated
  • Best Revival of a Musical - nominated
  • Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Musical (Santino Fontana) - nominated
  • Best Performance By an Actress in a Leading Role in a Musical (Laura Osnes) - nominated
  • Best Performance By an Actress in a Featured Role in a Musical (Victoria Clark) - nominated
  • Best Orchestrations (Danny Troob) - nominated
  • Best Costume Design of a Musical (William Ivey Long) - WINNER
  • Best Lighting Design of a Musical (Kenneth Posner) - nominated
  • Best Sound Design of a Musical (Nevin Steinberg) - nominated
So, on the surface, a show that only wins for best costumes is kind of lame, but a) those costumes were spectacular, and b) "Cinderella" was a very serious competitor in at least 3 or 4 of the other categories (especially Leading Actress).  Although it might not have walked home with as many awards as it was maybe hoping for, they succeeded in getting me interested in the show, and isn't that really what it's all about?

CONCLUSION
As I said before, the revivals kind of blew my mind this year!  I think this is the first year we've had in a while where the revivals were significantly stronger than the original Musicals (in my opinion).  But perhaps some of  you have different opinions.  Did I give too much credit to the revivals?  Was I too harsh on Annie?  Can you think of a recent revival (other than Godspell) that could rival Pippin?  I'd love to hear any comments questions or concerns.  Go ahead and comment below, and be sure to check out the poll in the top left corner.  I'll be going out of town shortly so it might be a couple weeks before I get a chance to release my 3rd installment of the Tony Award series (Plays).  But feel free to do your own research at the Tony Awards Website and then check back in a few weeks to see if my thoughts line up with yours.  Until next time.... 

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Tony Awards 2013 (Part I: Original Musicals)

Hello fellow thespians!  And welcome to my 3rd Annual Tony Awards recap!  As always, I absolutely loved watching the Tony's last Sunday night!!  There were some stellar performances, heartfelt speeches, triumphant moments, crushing defeats, and Neil Patrick Harris being.....just perfect!  In case you missed it (or you were watching from Atlanta and missed the last 7 minutes) you can watch the entire show here. There was even some history that was made at this years ceremony, but I'll get to that later.  I'll be doing this in several installments (probably 5), but for now let's just focus on the race that everyone really cares about: Best Musical!

AND THE NOMINEES FOR BEST MUSICAL ARE:

BRING IT ON: THE MUSICAL
Now, I have received some mocking from my friends for liking parts of this musical, so allow me to set the record straight:  Bring It On: The Musical is possibly the best example since Legally Blonde, of how a good creative team can make a bad concept a good musical.  Although I really don't have much respect for the original movie, they put together a pretty brilliant team to make this work, and their rewards was a Tony nomination.  I mean, I don't know who had the idea of putting together the talents of Lin Manuel Miranda [In the Heights], Tom Kitt, [Next To Normal], Amanda Greene [Hands on a Hardbody], Andy Blankenbuehler [Annie (2012 Revival)], and Jeff Whitty [Avenue Q] in one show....but they should be given a Tony Award just for that!!!  Of course, although I think this is a great team and it made for some really great moments, the show isn't really my style.  The characters are a bit too cliche and everything is too "hip" for me.  I don't know if it's because I haven't really had the "standard" highschool experience, but I really couldn't relate to the characters and so the story kind of fell flat to me.  As for the music, I felt like the rapping was just a bit too much like In the Heights and the rest of it didn't do all that much for me (although, admittedly, I haven't heard the whole soundtrack).  The choreography however, was actually very cool.  Everything I've read about in interviews and reviews and seen in videos looked pretty darn impressive, and what's even cooler is a lot of them didn't have much cheer experience before the show.  As for their performance, it was actually a bit of a disappointment.  I mean, they chose a shortened version of my favorite song from the show ("It's All Happening") but, in my opinion, they spent too much time on the rapping and "boring" parts of the song and didn't devote enough of their time to the high flying acrobatics and beautiful harmonies that they began to show towards the end.  If their whole performance had been that good, then I think I would've enjoyed it much better.  See if you agree:
Bring It On: The Musical was nominated for 2 Awards and did not win any.
  • Best Musical - nominated
  • Best Choreography (Andy Blankenbuehler) - nominated
While I'm actually fairly surprised Andy didn't win Choreography, I knew that it had no shot at best Musical. I'm fairly happy with the way things turned out and I think the show has a right to be proud of itself.  I only hope that this team could get together to write a musical with better subject matter.


A CHRISTMAS STORY
As I've said before in my nomination post, I love A Christmas Story and I'm so glad it was nominated...but I really didn't expect it to win anything (and it didn't).  However, even if it didn't enjoy a bunch of commercial success, I'm so thrilled that it exists!  I think the idea of making a musical out of the classic movie was a genius idea and I think they did a perfect job of maintaining the magical, fantasy elements of the movie in the stage version.  I'm also beyond thrilled that Benj Pasek and Justin Paul (who wrote the music) got Tony nominations for their Broadway debut!  I've loved their music for a long time, and the fact that the world is getting a chance to fall in love with them as I have is just fantastic!  Of course, this wasn't their best music, and the show itself doesn't really do much for me.  I mean, I love the concept, and I think it was well done, but there's not really anything about it that jumps out and grabs me.  This could be seen in their Tony performance.  Although it was fairly good, I can't say that it was anything really fantastic.  I think they did a good job putting it together (mixing "Red Ryder Carbine Action BB Gun", one of the better songs audibly, with "You'll Shoot Your Eye Out", probably the best song visually).  They also did a fairly good job of capturing the random, fantasy nature of the show, but it wasn't really that spectacular.  The exception to this is a young man named Luke Spring.  This pint-sized performer completely stole the show with his dancing!  It was some of the most impressive moves I've seen anyone do, and almost definitely the best I've ever seen from someone of his age! Take a look:
A Christmas Story, The Musical was nominated for 3 Awards and didn't win any.
  • Best Musical - nominated
  • Best Book of a Musical (Joseph Robinette) - nominated
  • Best Original Score (Music and/or Lyrics) Written for the Theatre (Benj Pasek and Justin Paul) - nominated
Once again, I'm not surprised (and not disappointed) that A Christmas Story was dominated by Kinky Boots and Matilda in all of these categories.  But I'm glad that it was nominated and I think that the writers should be very proud of their accomplishment!

KINKY BOOTS
Now, I'm not going to lie, I like this show now much better than I did on Sunday.  I mean, I had always thought it wasn't bad, I appreciated the cast and was a fan of Harvey Fierstein's work, but I thought it was kind of cheap to have Cyndi Lauper as the songwriter and I wasn't thrilled by the subject matter.  But after seeing all of the acceptance speeches, watching their Tony performance, and listening to the soundtrack, I can now say that I'm actually a fan of the show.  There are still parts of it that I'm not in love with, but it definitely has some really good music, a great set of characters, a unique plotline, some dazzling choreography, and...let's be honest....some pretty fabulous shoes!  I still don't like it as much as, say, Matilda or some of the revivals, but I'm honestly not disappointed it won best show and I'm glad it's doing well.  As for their Tony performance, it didn't go over super well with most of the guests at my party (as soon as someone said "those are all men by the way" concerning the divas coming down the conveyor belt, there was a general sound of disgust and surprise), but I actually really enjoyed it.  I thought the song was catchy, the choreography inventive, and parts of it were really funny.  I'm not going to say it was my favorite performance of the evening, but it was definitely right up there!  See for yourself:
Kinky Boots was nominated for 13 Awards and won 6.
  • Best Musical - WINNER
  • Best Book of a Musical (Harvey Fierstein) - nominated
  • Best Original Score (Music and/or Lyrics) Written for the Theatre (Cyndi Lauper) - WINNER
  • Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Musical (Stark Sands) - nominated
  • Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Musical (Billy Porter) - WINNER
  • Best Performance by an Actress in a Featured Role in a  Musical (Annaleigh Ashford) - nominated
  • Best Direction of a Musical (Jerry Mitchell)
  • Best Choreography (Jerry Mitchell) - WINNER
  • Best Orchestrations (Stephen Oremus) - WINNER
  • Best Scenic Design of a Musical (David Rockwell) - nominated
  • Best Costume Design of a Musical (Gregg Barnes) - nominated
  • Best Lighting Design of a Musical (Kenneth Posner) - nominated
  • Best Sound Design of a Musical (John Shivers) - WINNER
All in all, I'm not very surprised by how Kinky Boots turned out.  I expected them to win almost everything they did, even if I don't agree with all the decisions.  My biggest disappointment (that I actually saw coming) was that Billy Porter beat out Rob McClure (Chaplin) for best leading actor.  But, that being said, Billy Porter's acceptance speech was truly beautiful and his performance pretty impressive, so, if Rob couldn't win, I'm glad that Billy did.  It also should be noted, that Cyndi Lauper made history as being the first woman to ever win a Tony for music and lyrics by herself (all other female winners were part of writing teams).  So congrats to Cyndi!

Matilda The Musical
Ok, so I think it's safe to say that, in most categories, Matilda was the favorite at my party.  And why not?  The sets are stunning, the book clever, the music catchy, the acting flawless, the story timeless, all in all it is a fantastic show!  I'm so glad that it came to America and I hope it has a long and profitable run on Broadway!  And even after that, I hope that they release the rights for schools and community theaters to perform it, because I'd love to see all the different takes on it that I'm sure would come!  However, I'm not going to lie, there is a patriotic part of me that kind of resented the fact that it was a London transfer.  I mean, I still love the show, but you know how I get kind of annoyed by musicals that are based off movies, because I feel like there's not as much originality?  That feeling is kind of compounded when the show is a transfer.  There was a part of me that felt like the show got it's awards in England and it shouldn't infringe too much on the Tony's.  Of course, I know that this isn't completely fair because a lot of the actors and designers are different...but still.  As for their performance, I thought it was pretty great.  I wished that they could've used more of Bertie Carvel (although his opening bit was awesome!) and I thought bringing Mrs. Honey out in the middle kind of made the performance lose some of it's energy.  I feel like if they had kept the adrenaline pumping throughout the whole medley (Ala Kinky Boots) then it might've been a bit more enjoyable.  Of course, they did play some of my favorite songs from the show, and they did a good job of highlighting each of the important actors, so I give them props for that.  And, like I said, all in all, I did really like the performance.  See if you agree:
Matilda The Musical was nominated for 12 Awards and won 4.
  • Best Musical - nominated
  • Best Book of a Musical (Dennis Kelly) - WINNER
  • Best Original Score (Music and/or Lyrics) Written for the Theatre (Tim Minchin) - nominated
  • Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Musical (Bertie Carvel) - nominated
  • Best Performance by an Actor in a Featured Role in a Musical (Gabriel Ebert) - WINNER
  • Best Performance by an Actress in a Featured Role in a Musical (Lauren Ward) - nominated
  • Best Direction of a Musical (Matthew Warchus) - nominated
  • Best Choreography (Peter Darling) - nominated
  • Best Orchestrations (Chris Nightingale) - nominated
  • Best Scenic Design of a Musical (Rob Howell) - WINNER
  • Best Costume Design of a Musical (Rob Howell) - nominated
  • Best Lighting Design of a Musical (Hugh Vanstone) - WINNER
Again, there aren't a lot of surprises in Matilda's wins, and I'm pretty happy with all of the choices.  I think it deserved the two design awards it won (props to Hugh for beating Kenneth on all three accounts!).  I definitely think it deserved best book, and, although I didn't know much about him previously, I think I'm glad that Gabriel won for Featured Actor (his acceptance speech was actually really funny).  There is a part of me that feels bad that the Matilda's couldn't be nominated and that Bertie didn't win for his fantastic performance, but Bertie got an Oliver for the role, and the Matilda's got a "Special Tony Award" so I think that balances things out.  All in all, I think the Tony committee got Matilda right.

Conclusion:
Well, there you have it folks.  The 2013 Nominees for best musical.  All excellent shows and all (for the most part) deserving of the awards (or lack thereof) that they received.  At least, that's what I think.  Do you agree?  Do you think I was too hard on a show?  Or gave one a bit too much credit?  I promise I'll read and respond to any comments you post, so feel free to leave some.  And make sure you vote in the poll (top left) and come back to read the rest of my Tony Posts as soon as they're up. Thanks for reading!

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

TONY NOMINATIONS 2013

Ahh Tony time.  I'm so sorry I've waited this long to post my thoughts on the Tony nominations.  My life has been super busy over the past few months (of course, I carved out time to watch Sutton Foster and Jesse Tyler Ferguson live as they read out the Tony nominations) and it is just now slowing down.  Of course, I realize that the TONY's are coming soon, so I figured I better get this out significantly before then.  Like last year, I'll go through the nominations by category and by show explaining my top picks and why I do or don't like the nomination decisions.  For all of you who don't always keep up on the Broadway news who want to sound like they know what they're talking about at the TONY party they're going to (and if you're not going to a TONY party, throw one yourself!) then this will serve as a handy cheat-sheet to get you caught up.  Well, without further ado, let's begin :)



Best Performance by an Actress in a Featured Role in a Play
Carrie Coon -- Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Shalita Grant -- Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike
Judith Ivey -- The Heiress
Judith Light -- The Assembled Parties
Condola Rashad -- The Trip to Bountiful

Unfortunately, the plays this year don't seem to be anywhere near as good as last years.  There are a few interesting ones out there, but on the whole, a lot of them just seem kind of drab.  What's more, Youtube has yielded less video footage than last year, so I can't even find any footage of several of these actors on the stage.  From what I can tell, Shalita Grant plays the comedic relief in a comedy, Judith Light is practically a lead and so her character is dynamic, Carrie Coon plays the comedic relief in a drama, and I just have no idea what Condola Rashad or Judith Ivey do!  I'm giving my pick to Carrie Coon because her character seems to be absolutely hysterical (even though I can't find a scene that features her on Youtube).  I don't think she'll win, because comedic actresses never win (I imagine Judith Light wins), but I think it'd be nice if the comedies won out.

Best Performance by an Actor in a Featured Role in a Play
Danny Burstein -- Golden Boy
Richard Kind -- The Big Knife
Billy Magnussen -- Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike
Tony Shalhoub -- Golden Boy
Courtney B. Vance -- Lucky Guy

There's a bit more meat in the featured actor category than featured actress.  I've at least gotten to see a little of each of these nominees in the videos around Youtube.  Personally, I really enjoyed all each of their performances.  However, with all of these wonderful nominees, I think I give my edge to Tony Shalhoub.  It might just be because I know the actor from his other work, but I'm always floored by his diversity, and this role is no different.  The role he plays in Golden Boy (Joe's father) is just so different from every other character I've ever seen him in and yet there is absolutely nothing about his performance reminiscent of a past performance.  His voice, his mannerisms, his very face is so unique to this character.  Of course, I do have to give props to the other nominees.  I didn't get to see much of Burstein in the videos for golden boy, but I've seen bits of him in other shows (such as Follies last year and Talley's Folly this year) and I'm sure he was equally great in this.  I'd like to see Richard Kind's performance because I know he played a rather serious villain in The Big Knife, but I'd only seen him in comedic roles, so in the footage I did see of him it was hard to take him seriously.  Although, the reviews I read said he did an excellent job, so I wouldn't be shocked if he won.  Billy Magnussen, was also a really fun one to watch.  His role was hilarious and SO high energy.  Unfortunately, I felt like the role was  really best as a gimmick.  The purpose of his character (in the scene's that I saw) was really to do/say something ridiculous so that David Hyde Pierce's character could make a sarcastic jab at him that will go completely over his head.  As for Courtney B. Vance, I liked his performance well enough, but I just don't get the appeal of Lucky Guy.  The character's they all play (New York reporters) are just too cliche, so it doesn't really demand my interest.  Long story short, Shalhoub is my favorite, with Magnussen as a fairly distant second and Kind right behind him.

Best Performance by an Actor in a Featured Role in a Musical
Charl Brown -- Motown The Musical
Keith Carradine -- Hands on a Hardbody
Will Chase -- The Mystery of Edwin Drood
Gabriel Ebert -- Matilda The Musical
Terrence Mann -- Pippin

THE MUSICALS!!!  Ok, the disappointment in the plays of this season is made up by the awesome musicals that descended upon us.  And, this year's seasons of musicals is practically devoid of dramatic shows.  Yes, don't expect a quiet Once or dark Next to Normal to be taking home awards this year.  Practically all of the shows this year have been full of camp, glitz, and glamour.  This is wonderfully presented in the nominees for Featured actor, every single one of which (with one possible exception) is undeniably comedic.  Unfortunately, I cannot find actual footage of most of these men, and for several of them the soundtrack has yet to be released.  So, I may be a bit biased towards Will Chase because the most information (both the videos and soundtrack) is available for him.  Of course, everything I've seen of him is truly wonderful!  His facial expressions are hysterical, his voice is superb, his mustache is excellent, and he plays a difficult (although incredibly amazing) character to perfection!  Of course, his competition has some juicy roles as well.  Keith Carradine, I've been told, is wonderfully funny in Hands on a Hardbody.  Since he's not one of the contestants (I think he plays the dealership owner), I haven't seen much of him in the highlight reels, but every review I've read of him says he just steals the show with his "one-liners".  And although I can't find much footage of Gabriel Ebert, I've been able to see some of the character (Mr. Wormwood) from the London cast.  That, compared to the montage footage I've seen and the interviews I've heard/read tell me that Gabriel is hilarious and definitely deserves his nomination.  The same goes with Terrence Mann, although I haven't been able to see much footage of him playing Charlemagne, I loved him in his previous roles (including The Beast [Beauty and the Beast], Javert [Les Miserables], and Chauvelin [The Scarlet Pimpernel]) and I completely see him as this role in Pippin.  As for Charl Brown....well I just don't like Motown.  To me (with one or two exceptions), there's no acting, it's just some Jukebox songs strung together.  So I hope Will Chase gets the award, but if anyone else, except Charl, gets it, then I'll be happy.

Best Performance by an Actress in a Featured Roll in a Musical
Annaleigh Ashford -- Kinky Boots
Victoria Clark -- Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella
Andrea Martin -- Pippin
Keala Settle -- Hands on a Hardbody
Lauren ward -- Matilda the Musical

Again, there are plenty of splendid nominees here.  I've seen Annaleigh Ashford (Margot [Legally Blonde], and singing an awesome version of "Freedom" by Kerrigan and Lowdermilk), and of course Andrea martin is well known for her stage roles (including Frau Blucher [Young Frankenstein] and Alice Miller [My Favorite Year]).  And both of them gave wonderful performances!  Annaleigh Ashford's role in Kinky Boots was really funny and her voice was perfect for it.  Unfortunately, she is out-shined by the stellar Andrea Martin.  I haven't been able to find a video of the new version of "No Time At All" (her big number) but almost every review I've read says it's by far the highlight of an already amazing show (they also reference this huge stunt in the song  that nobody seems to want to give spoilers to).  She's so funny, and has such a great voice, and honestly, with all the reviews I've read, I have trouble seeing her not winning. The other nominees I'd never even heard of before, so it was nice to learn some new names.  Victoria Clark's "Fairy Godmother" was alright I suppose, but her operatic voice combined with Rodger's & Hammerstein's score just didn't do much for me.  Lauren Ward's "Miss Honey" was fairly sweet, but she had the unfortunate role of singing most of my least favorite songs on the soundtrack, so I really haven't learned to appreciate her performance.  As for Keala Settle, apparently her song stole the show in Hands in a Hardbody which is impressive considering the cast assembled for that show.  She seems like a very talented lady who I think might have fared well in another season, but I just don't see her beating the distinguished Mrs. Martin.

Best Direction of a Play
Pam MacKinnon -- Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Nicholas Martin -- Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike
Bartlett Sher -- Golden Boy
George C. Wolfe -- Lucky Guy

There isn't a clear winner here the way it was last year, but I think I'm going to give my vote to Bartlett Sher of Golden Boy.  The show requires and interesting dichotomy (between sports and art), and this seems to be represented really well on the stage.  Sher did a good job getting the boxing to look legitimate, and found a way to blend these two worlds really masterfully.  My second choice would probably be Pam MacKinnon because the videos I've seen show really great use of the single set stage, which I attribute largely to the director's blocking.

Best Direction of a Musical
Scott Ellis -- The Mystery of Edwin Drood
Jerry Mitchell -- Kinky Boots
Diane Paulus -- Pippin
Matthew Warchus -- Matilda The Musical

This category includes the four strongest shows of the year, so of course this will be a tight one.  They're all beautifully directed, but my edge goes to Diane Paulus because, like Golden Boy, Pippin had to find a way to blend two worlds (in this case, ancient England and modern circus) and this was done brilliantly.  Paulus knew exactly when to make  song larger than life and when to tone it down to something simple and chose the exact right stunts to put at the exact right scenes, and that's why I think she should win.  My second choice would probably be Matthew Warchus because I really like the exaggerated  almost comic-book like, way that his entire show was put together.

Best Choreography
Andy Blankenbuehler -- Bring It On: The Musical
Peter Darling -- Matilda The Musical
Jerry Mitchell -- Kinky Boots
Chet Walker -- Pippin

This was a bit of a tough one between Pippin and Bring It On.  I didn't want to give it to Kinky Boots because, although I enjoyed the choreography I saw, it wasn't anything we haven't seen on the stage before. As for Matilda, although the choreography was really unique and I see where they were going with it, it just looks really bad to me.  It's like 7-year-olds trying to do cool, combative, hip hop moves, then 30-year-olds trying to be 7-year-olds trying to do cool, combative, hip hop moves....which is an image I will never erase from my mind.  Now, I was going to choose Pippin until I realized that, unlike the Drama Desk Awards, Chet Walker is the only choreographer listed.  From what I've read/scene, Chet was only in charge of the "non-circus" choreography (and some of that he even stole exactly from Fosse's original choreography).  However, in Bring it On, not only was the cheer leading really impressive, but the regular choreography seemed to fit and was actually pretty cool.  So, while he's no Chris Gattelli (13, Newsies, Alter Boyz), Andy Blankenbuehler has a cooler last name, and gets my pick for this year.

Best Orchestrations
Chris Nightingale -- Matilda The Musical
Stephen Oremus -- Kinky Boots
Ethan Popp & Bryan Crook -- Motown The Musical
Danny Troob -- Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella

I really don't have strong feelings about this category either way.  I don't know that any of the orchestrations are particularly impressive simply because I don't know music well enough.  I'm giving it to Mr. Troob because he had to "re-orchestrate" something that already existed.  For this same reason I'm giving the Motown boys second place, because they had to take some classic, pre-written songs and make medleys and mash-ups, and transfer it to a full Broadway orchestra.  I honestly don't know if arranging pre-written music is harder or not, but I feel like it's more noticeable...so congrats to Danny, Ethan, and Bryan!

Best Scenic Design of a Play
John Lee Beatty -- The Nance
Santo Loquasto -- The Assembled Parties
David Rockwell -- Lucky Guy
Michael Yeargan -- Golden Boy

Set Design is a tough category to judge from only watching videos because what makes a set beautiful is the transitions.  Anybody can make a nice set, but one that can survive change is really important.  In the clips, I get to see a few of the sets, but never any of the transitions.  I chose Golden Boy because they had one or two effects I really liked with the boxing rings, and that's really all I can base my decision off of.  I won't be particularly excited or disappointed regardless of where this nomination lands, because I thought all of the sets were...average.

Best Scenic Design of a Musical
Rob Howell -- Matilda The Musical
Anna Louizos -- The Mystery of Edwin Drood
Scott Pask -- Pippin
David Rockwell -- Kinky Boots

Now, this category had a way more interesting line up!  All of these nominees actually have pretty cool sets.  "Drood" not only has set up a beautiful, regal theater in the lobby and such, but they've really created some nice pieces on the stage (my favorite is Neville and Helena's room).  Pippin also has a really cool functioning set (mostly for the circus folks to play with) but I'm just not sure which qualifies as sets and which as props.  Kinky Boots was also really nice.  It included a rather official looking factory floor (complete with working conveyor belt that drag-queens could dance on).  But hands down the victory has to go to Matilda! The scrabble tiles (for lack of a better term) alone make the stage epic, and then when you add the swings, and the desks, and the Trunchbull's office, and Matilda's room, you end up with this labyrinth of comic-book amazingness!  Out of all the creative awards this year, I feel most confident that Matilda will win best Scenic Design.

Best Costume Design of a Play
Soutra Gilmour -- Cyrano de Bergerac
Ann Roth -- The Nance
Albert Wolsky -- The Heiress
Catherine Zuber -- Golden Boy

Again, I have no strong feelings about this one.  Personally I thought the costumes for The Heiress was (like most of it's other aspects) rather drab.  For Golden Boy, well I just feel like the costumes were really easy (put a couple of muscular sweaty guys in baggy shorts and everyone else in period clothes).  So that leaves us with The Nance and "Cyrano".  It's really tough between these two.  "Cyrano" has some really nice period clothes and did a really excellent job transporting us back to the days of yore.  However, I give my "edge" to The Nance because I feel like it had a harder job.  Because it's a show about vaudeville/burlesque, It had to give both "costumes" and "street clothes" to every character.  In the highlight reel alone I saw Nathan Lane in at least 8-10 costumes and I'm sure there were plenty more where that came from.  The costumes in The Nance had to capture both sides of Chauncey's life, and I think that important task was well accomplished by Ms. Roth.  So, while Ms. Gilmour gets an honorable mention, Ann Roth gets my vote for the win.

Best Costume Design of a Musical
Gregg Barnes -- Kinky Boots
Rob Howell -- Matilda The Musical
Dominique Lemieux -- Pippin
William Ivey Long -- Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella

Once again, each of these nominees are more exciting than the plays.  From the fashionable queens of Kinky Boots to the shocking amounts of plaid in Matilda to the circus leotards of Pippin to the regal elegance of Cinderella all of these shows have something special about them.  I thought long about each of these nominees and each and every one of them were my favorites at one point or another...but I finally landed on Cinderella.  Although I don't love all of Cinderella's costume choices (the Fairy Godmother is just WEIRD), they have beautiful ball gowns and some pretty stylish rags.  But what's coolest (as could be expected) is the speed at which one changes to the other.  The grandeur  the intricacy, and the flexibility of these costumes are what give it the inch above all the other nominees in my book.

Best Lighting Design of a Play
Jules Fisher & Peggy Eisenhauer -- Lucky Guy
Donald Holder -- Golden Boy
Jennifer Tipton -- The Testament of Mary
Japhy Weideman -- The Nance

It's kind of tough to make a decision in for this one, because it isn't the kind of thing I care very much about.  I can find no videos of the lighting used in The Testament of Mary, and the rest of the nominee's seemed to have only average lighting.  I guess I'll half-heartedly give it to The Nance because it did have some, at the very least different, lighting during some of the burlesque scenes, and because the technical awards seem to go in groups, and I think The Nance will win several other technical awards.

Best Lighting Design of a Musical
Kenneth Posner -- Kinky Boots
Kenneth Posner -- Pippin
Kenneth Posner -- Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella
Hugh Vanstone -- Matilda The Musical

Ok, first off, I want to mention my disappointment in the lack of Chaplin's nomination.  The videos I saw looked like they did some really cool things with the lights and I'm sorry they couldn't be recognized.  Secondly, we ought to give a HUGE shout out to Kenneth Posner!  Not only did he practically sweep the category, but these also take him to the 10 nomination mark (other nominated works include Wicked and Hairspray).  Unfortunately, although I now have a TON of respect for Mr. Posner, I have to give my pick to Hugh Vanstone's Matilda.  As I've said in the other technical awards, the Matilda creative team completely transforms the stage into this larger than life, "comic book-esc" wonderland and the lighting is an important part of that.  So, although I wish Kenneth all the best, I echo Jesse Tyler Ferguson in saying "Good luck Hugh!"

Best Sound Design of a Play
John Gromada -- The Trip to Bountiful
Mel Mercier -- The Testament of Mary
Leon Rothenberg -- The Nance
Peter John Still and Marc Salzberg -- Golden Boy

I can't imagine why, but for some reason, there aren't a lot of shows on Broadway who put a lot into advertising their sound design, and it's rare to find a review that highlights it.  I'm not sure a single video I could find even used a sound effect or anything else that the Sound Designer could be thanked for.  So, like last year, I'm just not going to vote for this because I have no idea.  I think it's possible The Trip to Bountiful will win because I heard in a single interview that there was some singing and some cool music in the show.  But then I suppose the same would be true of The Nance, and Golden Boy should at least have some violin music.  And I don't even know what Testament of Mary is doing up here....I'm so confused as to why this category even exists.

Best Sound Design of a Musical
Jonathan Deans & Garth Helm -- Pippin
Peter Hylenski -- Motown: The Musical
John Shivers -- Kinky Boots
Nevin Steinberg -- Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella

Again.  Who knows?  For musicals it's particularly hard because I have no clue what falls under "Best Score" and "Best Sound Design".  So I'm afraid that once again I can't really vote.  I'm honestly kind of upset that this is still a category, because there is a little voice in my head that screams "WHO CARE'S" every singly year...

Best Book of a Musical
Joseph Robinette -- A Christmas Story, The Musical
Harvey Fierstein -- Kinky Boots
Dennis Kelly -- Matilda The Musical
Douglas Carter Beane -- Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella

As in previous years, this category is flooded with adaptations.  Perhaps it's because I'm a purest, but I really want to see more truly original musicals on Broadway (I mean, almost every play seems to be original!  Why can't the musicals be?).  So, since they're all adaptations, I have to judge them in their ability to keep the heart of the original story and yet still provide something new and fresh that transfers well to the stage.  I ended up giving it to Matilda because I feel like they took the freshest take of the take.  I haven't seen the original Kinky Boots movie, but I know that A Christmas Story and Cinderella both stayed very close to the screenplay and didn't really make something new as much.  Whereas Matilda took things in a completely different direction from anything I've seen before.  And it is for that originality that I name Dennis Kelly my pick for Best Book.

Best Original Score Written for the Theatre
Benj Pasek & Justin Paul -- A Christmas Story, The Musical
Trey Anastasio & Amanda Green -- Hands on a Hard Body
Cyndi Lauper -- Kinky Boots
Tim Minchin -- Matilda The Musical

Ok, so I'm afraid that there are really only two real contenders for this award.  Pretty much everybody knows that it will either go to Kinky Boots or Matilda. However, before I get to those I wanna talk about the other two nominees.  First off, I think it's SO cool that Pasek and Paul are nominated.  I've been a fan of theirs for years (they did EDGES, Dogfight, James and the Giant Peach, and plenty of awesome stand alone songs).  I was thrilled that they were finally getting a show on Broadway and I got REALLY excited when I heard that they were nominated.  As I said, I doubt they'll win, but it is just SO cool that they'll nominated.  I'm sure that this is just the beginning of several nominations and that they'll win one before long.  As for Hands on a Hardbody, I haven't been able to hear more than one or two songs (because they haven't released the full soundtrack yet) but what I have heard doesn't seem quite my style (a bit too country).  However, I think the cast they have singing it (including Hunter Foster [Urinetown, Little Shop of Horrors 2003 Revival], Allison Case [Hair 2009 Revival,and several concerts), and James Armstrong Johnson [35MM New York Premiere, Catch Me If You Can (Ensemble)]) and they seemed to have a real good energy.  Although I'm sad that it likely won't win, I'm glad the show got at least this one major nomination.  Now, onto the two contenders.  Matilda and Kinky Boots has been going back and forth this entire awards season fighting against each other and this is no difference.  Although I genuinely like both soundtracks, my pick goes to Matilda because of I feel like the soundtrack as a whole is stronger.  Kinky Boots has a couple of really good songs, but Matilda makes every song stand out and every song is wonderful on it's own and in the context of the show.  For this reason, Matilda is my pick.

Best Revival of a Play
Golden Boy
Orphans
The Trip to Bountiful
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?

All of these are good nominees.  I am intrigued and excited by each and every one of them.  Some of them I understand better than others, but they all look like strong, well written stories, that are beautifully performed.  I give my pick to Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf because I feel like it gave the best show for the least gimmicks.  It has no star power (unlike the other nominee's who boast names like Tony Shalhoub, Alec Baldwin, and Cuba Gooding Jr.), it had no flashy sets and no crazy stunts.  It had strong characters, smart dialogue, a good arc, and it seems to be plain entertaining.  Of course, all of the shows do look amazing (and I'd love to see each of them if I had the chance), but this is the one that I think is truly special.

Best Revival of a Musical
Annie
The Mystery of Edwin Drood
Pippin
Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella

A few months ago, I was sure that I was going to give my pick to "Drood" and that there was nothing anybody could do about it.  That show had a STELLAR cast, brilliant writing, a wonderful creative team, and I think bringing it back to New York is one of the best decisions made on Broadway in a long, LONG time!  I love this show particularly, but I especially love the fact that it's back!  I think it's a brilliant show and the world really needed to be reminded of it, and this production definitely did the show justice!  In addition I didn't think it had much competition.  I've never really liked Annie and I feel like the new production was just entirely unnecessary.  The audience knew every single thing that would ever happen because it is too well known, and they didn't add anything substantial to the show.  I feel similarly about Cinderella.  Although I actually am glad that it came to Broadway, it follows the original Cinderella story line too closely so the audience can't expect anything they haven't already seen before.  That's why I thought "Drood" was a lock for the win.  However, the only thing that I like better than a revival that comes at the perfect time, is a revival that takes a show in a completely different direction...and it works.  That's exactly what Pippin did.  They took a show that I always liked (even if I never got a lot of it) and they found a way to make it new, and fresh, and...well...better.  I can honestly say I love every single thing about this new production!  I love the circus elements, I love the new cast (especially the new Pippin), the new arrangements of the music, every single thing they changed they were right to to change.  I don't know if everyone will feel the same as I do, but I just feel like this is the perfect example of keeping true to the original show while making it entirely your own and unique.  On the other hand, while I absolutely ADORE "Drood", it is close to a carbon copy of the original production.  So, while I hate that they have to go against each other, I have to give my pick to Pippin.

Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Play
Tom Hanks -- Lucky Guy
Nathan Lane -- The Nance
Tracy Letts -- Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
David Hyde Pierce -- Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike
Tom Sturridge -- Orphans

This was another REALLY hard decision.  You can tell the strength of these performances when you realize that people like Jim Harvey [Harvey], Norbert Leo Butz [Dead Accounts], Patrick Page [Cyrano De Bergerac], Al Pacino [Glen Gary Ross], Paul Rudd [Grace], Alan Cumming [Macbeth], and several other hugely talented actors weren't even nominated for their performances.  I strongly considered each and every one of these nominees and I truly have no idea who's going to win.  Tom Sturridge, completely throws himself into his character and, although I wish I could see his character in some of his more dramatic scenes, his comedic timing is sublime and he really acts with his whole body.  David Hyde Pierce (who I've loved for some time) also gives a stellar comedic performance and finds a way to say every single line in a way that is natural, poignant, and at the same time hilarious!  He is truly one of the greatest masters of dry comedy I've ever seen.  And, although I'm not always a fan of Hollywood talent invading Broadway stages, Tom Hanks does a truly excellent job in Lucky Guy at being passionate and yet real and grounded.  He has an ease about him in this role that's really nice to see.  But to me the competition really comes down to Tracy Letts and Nathan Lane.  Both of these wonderfully talented actors give great performances that are alternatively hilarious and powerful.  Letts with his dry wit masking his inner darkness, and Lane with his campy charm covering his inner vulnerability, both of these characters are truly layered and detailed.  In the end, I ended up choosing Nathan Lane because I feel like he had to show the bigger range in his role.  Mr. Letts had to stay the same, grumpy, cunning man throughout his three hour show, but Mr. Lane has to jump from over the top to subtle in the blink of an eye.  His whole role is based on the two sides of him, which means he practically plays two characters, while keeping them in one body, and that is what I call a TONY award winning performance.

Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Play
Laurie Metcalf -- The Other Place
Amy Morton -- Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?
Kristine Nielsen -- Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike
Holland Taylor -- Ann
Cicely Tyson -- The Trip To Bountiful

Another tough one.  Each of these women gave truly excellent performances.  I think all were rightly nominated (although, I'm a bit surprised Sigourney Weaver wasn't nominated).  I could definitely see any of these talented woman winning, but I think I will give my choice to Holland Taylor.  Although every single one of these performances were excellent, Ms. Taylor found a way to not only give a stellar performance, but also to do a remarkable impersonation.  I feel like more than the rest of the nominees, Ms. Taylor really delved into the character and learned every nuance  and every gimmick there is to know.  There aren't many people who can write and star in a one woman biographical show.  And I think when one does it, and nails it, she should be awarded.

Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Musical
Bertie Carvel -- Matilda The Musical
Santino Fontana -- Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella
Rob McClure -- Chaplin
Billy Porter -- Kinky Boots
Stark Sands -- Kinky Boots

This decision actually wasn't a hard one.  As much as I love the performances of all the nominees (and I genuinely do), Rob McClure's Chaplin is one of the most magical performances I've ever got to see (even through a computer screen).  The intense transformation he goes through is just stunning and, since I've seen every behind the scene's interview I can find, I know that he poured so much time and energy into the role and I know that he'll be remembered for it forever.  I just hope that that memory includes a Tony Award.  I kind of think he won't win (I think Billy Porter has the best chance), but I would LOVE to be wrong about that!  Rob McClure's performance was breathtaking and it deserves to be awarded!!!

Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Musical
Stephanie J. Block -- The Mystery of Edwin Drood
Carolee Carmello -- Scandalous
Valisia LeKae -- Motown The Musical
Patina Miller -- Pippin
Laura Osnes -- Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella

This is a fairly tough decision because I love almost all of these actresses both for the roles their nominated for and for roles past.  However, despite my love for each of them, I decided to give this Award to Laura Osnes because she seemed to have all the pieces.  She had the stage presence, the innocence, the acting skills, the killer singing voice, and the onstage chemistry with her leading man.  All of these pieces come together to create a truly beautiful performance that she can certainly be proud of.  Of course, I'd be happy if just about any of these nominees win (not Valisia LeKae...I just didn't like hers), but I do have a slight leaning towards Cinderella herself.

Best Play
The Assembled Parties
Lucky Guy
The Testament of Mary
Vanya and Sonia and Masha and Spike

Unfortunately, none of these plays completely jumped out at me and screamed "Winner".  In fact, there were some that I was very surprised to see!  I'm pretty shocked that The Testament of Mary was nominated, I didn't think it was very good at all.  I also didn't really like Lucky Guy very much, but I do admit that it has it's strong qualities, so I see why the nomination came.  It was a tough choice between the last two, and, to be honest, I think The Assembled Parties is going to win.  But I gave my vote to "Vanya" because I think it was more original and more entertaining.  The Assembled Parties pretty much just borrows cliches from other shows such as Clybourne Park and The Royal Family to make it's plot line work.  Of course, those are all winning cliche's, so I think it's possible that the show will win, but it just seemed kind of disingenuous to me.  "Vanya" on the other hand seemed to me to be very unique, and very well thought through.  The characters are detailed, the relationships intricate, the premise believable, all in all it is just a solid piece of theater and I hope it wins.

Best Musical
Bring It On: The Musical
A Christmas Story, The Musical
Kinky Boots
Matilda The Musical

This line up surprised a lot of people.  Of course, everybody knew that Kinky Boots and Matilda would be nominated (and I'd be pretty shocked if one of the other two won), but I don't know if anyone could've predicted Bring it On or A Christmas Story.  Especially with strong shows such as Chaplin, and Hands on a Hardbody, as possibilities, a lot of people were surprised to see a "seasonal show" and a a show based on a movie that's...let's just say that doesn't hold a lot of respect with the movie going elite.  I think both of these shows have their writing team to thank for their nominations.  They both took movies that just about everyone knew and completely revamped them into something different, and something special, and something that will stick with people.  Although I don't think either of them were knockouts, they each had some catchy songs and some beautiful moments, and they should be very proud of themselves.  Now, as for the other two shows, I give my pick to Matilda.  I have a suspicion that Kinky Boots will actually win, but I just love the innovation and creativity that went into Matilda and I would love for it to be recognized for that.

Best Ensemble in a Musical
Bring It On: The Musical
Hands on a Hardbody
The Mystery of Edwin Drood
Pippin

Ok, so this isn't a real category...but it should be!  A strong ensemble is so important to a show's success and there has to be a way to award an ensemble that can really take the audience on a ride.  I chose these for nominees myself based on what I've seen of each show.  Not only does these casts have great individual members making up their ensemble, but the chemistry and "sync" of the ensemble really stands out and caries the show.  I gave the award to Hands on a Hardbody because I feel like they exemplify exactly what a strong ensemble is.  The show reminds me of Titanic in the way that there really isn't such thing as a leading actor or actress.  Everyone in the show is a supporting actor and they all really work hard to support each other.  It's this team work and feeding off each other that make the show fun to watch and that's exactly why I'm awarding them with the first ever "Best Ensemble in a Musical" award.

Luke's Recap


Ann:
Although Luke didn't love the show, he was impressed with the the actress, Ms. Holland Taylor. 1 Nomination. 1 "Luke's Choice.

Annie:
Luke thought that the revival of Annie was unnecessary and didn't surprise the audience enough.  "1 Nomination".  0 "Luke's Choice."

The Assembled Parties:
Luke found the show to be rather cliche and didn't care much for it.  He thinks it will likely win 2 of it's three nominations, but doesn't want it to win any.  3 Nominations. 0 "Luke's Choice."

The Big Knife:
Luke didn't have strong feelings either way about this show.  He said he would've liked to see more footage of the show, but what he saw didn't particularly impress him.  1 Nomination.  0 "Luke's Choice."

Bring it On:
Luke thought the show wasn't a serious competitor for best musical but thought the choreography "seemed to fit and was actually pretty cool."  He was also impressed by the ensemble.  2 Nominations. 1 "Luke's Choice."

Chaplin:
Luke was a big fan of this show (more than the critics it seems) and thought that it deserved more nominations that it received.  He did adamantly proclaim his hopes that Chaplin would win it's one nomination, but that he finds that sadly unlikely.  1 Nomination.  1 "Luke's Choice."

A Christmas Story, The Musical:
Although Luke had plenty of nice things to say about A Christmas Story, he didn't think it quite had the muscle to beat power house shows like Matilda.  He is proud of the creative team, and hopes that they produce many other nominated shows, but doesn't think they'll be able to win any this year.  3 Nominations. 0 "Luke's Choice."

Cyrano De Bergerac:
Luke enjoyed the show, and was impressed by many of it's facets, but not enough to win it any of his picks.  1 Nomination.  2 "Luke's Choice" (but was runner up once).

Golden Boy:
Luke really enjoyed this show.  He felt that the creative team took some good risks and that the show was a strong contender in almost all of it's nominated categories.  8 Nominations.  3 "Luke's Choice."

Hands on a Hardbody:
Luke was a fan of the show and was disappointed it wasn't nominated for more awards.  Of course, he didn't feel like the show could stack up against shows such as Matilda and Kinky Boots in several categories, but he did single it out as having the best ensemble on Broadway.  3 Nominations (and one fake one).  0 "Luke's Choice" (But it one the fake category).

The Heiress:
Luke was quite disappointed in this show and honestly sad that it even got nominated. 2 Nominations. 0 "Luke's Choice."

Kinky Boots:
Luke didn't like Kinky Boots quite as much as the nominators seemed to.  Her certainly did like the show and mentioned several instances when he thought it would win in actuality and when he called it a "close second", but somehow shows like Pippin and Matilda always seemed to break ahead of it.  13 Nominations.  0 "Luke's Choice" (but runner up 3 times).

Lucky Guy:
Luke really didn't care much for this show.  He thought the cast gave strong performances, but the rest of the show kind of bored him.  6 Nominations. 0 "Luke's Choice."

Matilda The Musical:
Luke really liked Matilda!  He was a great fan of the London production and, although he had trouble finding much about the Broadway cast (which is possibly why he didn't choose any of them), he really enjoyed the music and book, and loved the "comic book" like theme that the creative team took.  12 Nominations. 5 "Luke's Choice."

Motown The Musical:
Luke didn't care much for Motown.  He found the show choppy and with no real plot.  He made a point to single out the nominated actors as ones he didn't particularly like and the only nice thing he really had to say about the show was regarding it's orchestrations.  4 Nominations. 0 "Luke's Choice" (but it was runner up once).

The Mystery of Edwin Drood:
Luke was a huge fan of this show and it almost won several awards.  He was impressed by the cast, creative team, and the material itself and called the decision to bring it back to Broadway "one of the best decisions made on Broadway in a long, LONG time!"  5 Nominations (and one fake one).  1 "Luke's Choice" (although it was runner up 3 times).

The Nance:
Luke really loved everything about The Nance.   He adored Nathan Lane's performance, and he appreciated several of the creative teams decisions on the piece.  5 Nominations. 3 "Luke's Choice."

Orphans:
Although Luke enjoyed what he could see of Orphans and was thoroughly intrigued by the premise, it's nominations landed in two of the most competitive play categories, so it couldn't beat shows like Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? and The Nance.  2 Nominations. 0 "Luke's Choice."

The Other Place:
Although this show was not nominated for much, Luke enjoyed what he saw of it.  He enjoyed all the performances and the chemistry that the leads had.  Unfortunately it wasn't nominated for much, and will likely win even less.  1 Nomination.  0 "Luke's Choice."

Pippin:
Luke was pretty ecstatic about the Pippin revival and had almost nothing bad to say about it!  He thought that they were right to make the changes from the original production that they did and he called it "the perfect example of keeping true to the original show while making it entirely your own and unique."  10 Nominations (and one fake one).  3 "Luke's Choice."

Rodgers + Hammerstein's Cinderella:
While Luke thought that Cinderella maybe was to familiar to be a good revival, he did mention how glad he was it was on Broadway and applauded it's costume designer and leading lady. 9 Nominations. 3 "Luke's Choice."

Scandalous:
Although Luke is a fan of Carolee Carmello (the leading actress and only nominee from the show), Scandalous just didn't much for him, or the box office apparently.  1 Nomination. 0 "Luke's Choice."

The Testament of Mary:
Like Lysistrata Jones last year, Luke just really doesn't like the over all concept of this show and that makes it hard to like it's pieces.  When one adds on that they've posted practically no reviews or videos that have to do with it's nominated categories, is it any wonder that Luke didn't choose to show it any love? 3 Nominations. 0 "Luke's Choice."

The Trip to Bountiful
Unfortunately, there are literally no videos of this performance so it was difficult for Luke to have a strong opinion one way or another.  He thinks it will likely win Sound Design and leading Actress, but he did not give them his "picks." 4 Nominations. 0 "Luke's Choice."

Vanya an Sonia and Masha and Spike:
Luke applauds "Vanya" for efficiently nabbing a nomination in all four acting categories and solutes this truly talented cast!  Every single cast member of this charming show seems to very thorough and detailed and he would love to see this show (preferably with this cast) someday.  6 Nominations. 1 "Luke's Choice" (but it was runner up once).

Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?:
This is one classic that Luke now really wants to see.  He was fascinated by the strong performances, the intricate characters, the strong script, and even the direction of the show.  He thinks it was definitely one of this years powerhouse plays.  5 Nominations.  2 "Luke's Choice" (but it was runner up twice).

CONCLUSION
By all accounts this is going to be a great TONY Awards!  There are some wonderful nominees and I think we can expect some splendid performances, exciting speeches, and Neil Patrick Harris being amazing!  One thing that I think will differentiate this year's Awards from those of the past are that I think the awards will be very spread out this year.  I really don't see a single show running away with more than 5-6 awards.  Whatever the breakout, I can't wait for the TONY's!

So do you think I was unfair to one of the nominees?  Which awards did I "get wrong"?  Feel free to comment below with your thoughts.  And be sure to check the poll in the top left corner and tell me what TONY performance you're most excited to see!  Thanks for reading!

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Luke's Reviews: Little Shop of Horrors

It's that time of year once again.  The time when Pebblebrook stuns the world once again with one of their matchless works of theatrical brilliance.  This time, the masters of stagecraft tried their hand at a classic Broadway love/horror story.  This show was kind of bitter-sweet for me because it was four years ago that I began to watch Pebblebrook shows.  This means that the generation I saw begin as freshmen are now graduating...which is sad to say the least.  Nevertheless, they went out with quite a "bang" and should be proud of their wonderful career at Pebblebrook.  So, with that, it is my pleasure to present you with my review of Pebblebrook Highschool's

The Show:
There's actually a really interesting story behind this show.  It started as a joke of a movie: the fastest movie ever made.  Apparently the director had just finished another movie and had 2 days left with the old set.  So he, along with some buddies, wrote, casted, and shot the entire movie (pretty much) in two days and one night.  Of course, instead of being dismissed as a throwaway film, it gave birth to a cult following and eventually inspired what was the highest grossing musical in off-Broadway history.  This show ran for 5 years (That's long for a Broadway show, and UNHEARD of for Off-Broadway, where maybe 2 shows recoup a year) and was eventually turned into a pretty good movie staring Ellen Greene (reprising the role she originated Off-Broadway), Rick Moranis, and Steve Martin with cameo appearances by Christopher Guest,and Bill Murray.  A Broadway production finally happened in 2003 and starred Hunter Foster and Kerry Butler in the leading roles.  The show itself has been a favorite of mine for a while because of it's good blend of comedy and drama, it's wonderful characters and one of Alan Menken's best scores ever.  This was my first time actually seeing the whole musical, and there certainly were some surprises.  Although there are somethings I didn't appreciate too much (I thought they were occasionally funny when they shouldn't have been), I still think the show is a conceptual masterpiece and if you ever get the opportunity, you should go see it.

The Production:
To be perfectly honest, this might have been my least favorite of the Pebblebrook shows I've seen (which still makes it better than most other highschool shows I've seen).  All of the actors did a great job and everything, but I just kind of felt like some things were a bit rushed and it didn't blow me away like Pebblebrook usually does.  Of course, I still loved it, it just wasn't quite as spellbinding as I had kind of hoped.

THE CREW

  • COSTUMING -- For most part the costumes are pretty cut and dry : Seymour's a geek, The narrators are in school uniforms, the bums are in trench coats, the dentist is in...well, a dentist costume.  All in all it's really simple.  However, that's not to say that Pebblebrook didn't add some interesting touches.  I particularly liked the crazy lady who talked to her sock and the guy with a trench coat full of knives.
  • SETS -- The set was also fairly standard.  Nothing ever moved on or off, it was simply half of a shop, a window, a couple of doors, and some stoops outside of the shop.  Once again, this set was perfect for the show, it just wasn't much of a marvel in and of itself.
  • CHOREOGRAPHY -- As is always the case, this show had significantly less choreography than the winter show.  There were really only two songs ("Skid Row" and "Finale Ultimo") and even that was fairly static choreography.  Of course, since the set took up most of the stage, they really didn't have a lot of options, but, once again, it was nothing extraordinary.
  • LIGHTING -- I actually noticed the impressive lighting in this show (which is a rare occurrence).  There were plenty of cool decisions made (such as flooding the stage with green lights during Audrey II's big numbers and letting the spotlight on Orin snap off when he died).  All in all, I get the feeling the lighting designers kind of had fun with this one, and I say good for them!
  • PUPPETRY -- Normally when I review a show I don't mention it's puppetry, but this is a special exception.  Obviously the biggest marvel of the show was the Giant Audrey II of Act II.  By the end of it, I get the feeling that the puppeteer just had a massive lever that he had to pretty much throw his whole weight into.  But I also really enjoyed the smaller puppets.  The growing puppet on the counter was impressive (but I feel bad for the guy who had to hide down there for a whole huge scene), but my favorite was when Seymour was carrying the plant.  It took me a while to figure it out, but I'm pretty sure the jacket he was wearing had a fake arm in the sleeve and he had his right arm in Audrey II the whole time.  The actor really did do an excellent job of looking like there was no correlation to what he was doing and what the plant was doing.  It made for one of my favorite scenes of the show.
THE CAST
  • Hannah S. (Audrey) - I'd actually seen Hannah in several Pebblebrook shows in the past, but she rarely had significant roles, so it was hard to notice her much until her "big break" here in "Little Shop".  For that reason I was anxious to see how she'd do and I must say she absolutely delivered.  The young lady who played Audrey in the movie (Ellen Greene) is the one actress that I really did not like (which is ironic, because she was the only one to transfer from the original Off-Broadway show).  It's actually become a bit of a feud in our house because we are a "house divided" on her (Ellen's) performance, but I think I may be winning now because Hannah just showed old Ellen Greene how the role should be played!  Although Hannah had plenty of talent to carry the character, what impressed me most about her performance was her smart choices.  Most Audreys I've seen (especially the one in the movie) appear to have a tough time blending the way they act and the way they sing, but Hannah was wise enough to tone them both down a bit so that they can blend.  When she spoke, the accent wasn't particularly strong and when she sung she didn't belt it out like no tomorrow, she kept things always controlled.  While you may think this would make the character weaker, I actually really appreciated the fact that the character finally blended into a seamless transition between singing and acting.  Brava Hannah!
  • Alex S. (Seymour) - Frequent readers will remember that I am Alex's biggest fan (I actually tried to send him an "I-just-wanted-you-to-know-that-I've-been-stalking-you-for-the-past-four-years-but-you're-so-awesome-so-please-don't-get-creeped-out" facebook message, but apparently you can't send messages like that to minors).  In fact, my fandom went to a new level when, as soon as I turned learned what show they were doing, I wanted to run to my sister and scream "Alex should be Seymour!" (as it happens she was in class....but as soon as she was out we had our fandom moment). Of course, I was thrilled when I reached the theater and realized that my dream casting had come true and I was going to get to see Alex in this perfect role for him.  And, as always, he didn't disappoint!  I felt like Alex was one of the few characters in the show that didn't overplay his stereotype and he made Seymour very realistic and relatable.  Although this may not have been his best performance (I can't get over how great he was in Dirty Rotten Scoundrels), he was the perfect choice for the character and I'm so thrilled that I got to see him in this role!
  • Mason L. & Jennifer G. (The other Seymour and Audrey) - For reasons that I don't completely understand, Pebblebrook decided to double cast the roles of Audrey and Seymour for this production.  This caused a friend of mine who was unfamiliar with the show great confusion when she saw the cast list included two "Audreys" and two Audrey IIs (puppeteer and voice).  My only guess as to why this was done is that they had several talented seniors that they wanted to give leads before they graduated.  I also think it might have something to do with them having less time to put this together than perhaps they had in past years.  In any case, although I regrettably couldn't see Mason or Jennifer perform, I really wish I could've 'cause I'm sure they'd have been excellent!  Jennifer was a stand-out actress in Dirty Rotten Scoundrels and Crazy For You and I would've been really interested to see her play Audrey.  Additionally, as I said in my Crazy for You post, I've loved watching Mason in the ensemble over the years and I really wish I could've finally seen him play a lead.  I imagine he was utterly fantastic and I'm so glad he got to play the role.
  • Hamilton M. (Mushnik) - Once again, Hamilton was wonderfully cast.  His niche is definitely in the over the top cheesy kind of characters.  Hamilton has a lot of high energy and every line he says (especially the jokes) is quick and well timed.  In fact (and I hope I'm not reaching a new level of creepy here), while rehearsing for a show I'm currently working on where I play a really high energy/bubbly type of character (not my norm), I literally stopped working for a bit and thought to myself: "How would the Pebblebrook guy do this role?" (we'll see in May whether or not it worked).  But I'm getting off topic, the point is, Hamilton has a great stage presence and always throws himself into his roles and that's what makes him so much fun to watch.  He was excellent in this role with every over-exaggerated "subtlety" from his accent to his facial expressions as he was listening through a door.  In addition, he and Alex once again got a great song together ("Mushnik and Son") which was, as usual, one of the funniest parts of the show.  It saddens me greatly that this will likely be Hamilton's last show that I see him in (I might make it to one more Pebblebrook show this school year, we'll see) but I definitely think he has a lot to be proud of as far as his Pebblebrook career.
  • Kristian H. (Orin) - Let me begin by saying, if you don't know who "Orin" is (like I did), he's the dentist (who knew he had a name?).  Although I didn't expect to see Kristian in this role, he was absolutely perfect for it!  I'm afraid he may be being typecast as the comedic villain (which isn't a bad type at all) because he speaks with such intensity, but he also has some perfect comedic timing.  You could genuinely feel terrified by him at several moments and then be laughing your head off at him the very next.  I wasn't sure if I was going to like him at first because his first big number of the show ("I Am Your Dentist") didn't do much for me.  However, his strength shone through in his "straight acting" scenes and he nailed his final song ("Do it Now") and all in all I feel he was perfectly casted.   Seeing as he's only a Sophomore, I'm very excited to see all the talent that Kristian brings to Pebblebrook in these next few years.
  • King J. & Austyn R. (Audrey II voice & Puppeteer) - I must say that I really enjoyed these guys performance.  I know the roles weren't necessarily very gratifying, and it's hard to feel happy with yourself when you're never actually seen, but they really did a great job.  The sync wasn't perfect (especially as Audrey II grew) but I imagine they didn't get a lot of time to practice with the actual puppet, so when you consider that it's actually pretty impressive.  The voice was also really good.  As is often the case, I had the voice from the movie in my head, and this guy didn't beat it, but came pretty darn close for a highschooler.  He definitely made the best of a tough situation by keeping his voice full of inflection and emotion.  Although I wouldn't call them the "stand out" performers of the show, this dynamic duo certainly did the role proud.
  • Domineek M., AnnEliza C., & Sabria W. (Chiffon, Ronnette, & Crystal) - I feel bad for putting these three ladies together because they really did have individuality, but I couldn't remember which name went with which face.  I can say that they were each outstanding.  The first to blow us away was "The short one" (Chiffon maybe?) who just let it all out in the opening "Skid Row" solo.  They all certainly had moments like that where they really shone, but most of the time they had to sing and move as one.  This is where things fell apart a little bit.  Some of their choreography wasn't in perfect sync and it's tough because, in a normal dance number, nobody would notice.  But the way these characters are set up, their timing had to be spot on.  This is one more reason I think perhaps they didn't have as much time as they wanted to, or else these details might have been better ironed out.  Once again, they were great, but one could see the glimmer of room for improvement (which is rare for Pebblebrook).
  • Rex G.  (Customer, Mr. Bernstein, Ms. Luce, Skip Snip) - I know what you're thinking, dang, this guy has a lot of roles.  And the answer is, you're right, but it could've been worse.  The original Off-Broadway cast had this actor playing 5 more (including Orin).  Although this goes against the highschool theater creed ("hand out as many parts as physically possible"), it really made for an awesome effect and Rex looked like he was having an awesome time with it.  He nailed the EXACT right character for the Customer, and then threw in some surprises with his other characters.  He was absolutely hilarious in "The Meek Shall Inherit" and really threw himself into the character(s).  More than anyone else in the cast I got the feeling that he was just enjoying himself and that was really fun to see.  Of course, he was wonderfully talented too and it was great to finally see him as a significant character, but mostly I just liked watching him have a ball on stage.
  • Ensemble - Of course the Ensemble was great as they always are.  They really didn't do very much at all (pretty much only appeared in "Skid Row" and "Finale Ultimo") but they were of course perfect. I did enjoy seeing some familiar faces in the Ensemble including Taylor-Kate E. (Penny in Hairspray) and Commodore P. (Moose in Crazy for You) and I kind of liked that they could still be a part of the show even if they weren't huge characters.
The Audience:
Ok, I know this usually isn't a section in my reviews because it's not a part of the show, but I had an abnormally high number of interesting audience encounters, so I thought I'd share them here.
  • Mason L. & Jennifer G. - I thought it was cool that the day they didn't perform, these two sat in the back together and watched the show.  I almost wish I could've been sitting next to them so that I could hear whatever commentary they might have had, because it's a really unique experience to get to see a show live that you were also a part of.
  • Zach T. - I had the distinct pleasure of seeing Zach in Pebblebrook's production of Ragtime a few years ago.  He played "Edgar" and, although he wasn't a show stealler (you'd have to be pretty amazing to steal a show from Pebblebrook kids) he did really well for a fifth grader.  Anyway,  I had noticed that this kid behind us said "hi" to Mason as he walked past and I began to wonder how they knew each other.  Lucky for me, another person behind me was thinking the same thing, only he had the courage to ask about it.  Before I even took a good luck at Zach, I heard that he was, in fact, the very same boy who had been in Ragtime years before, just back from performing in the Mary Poppins National tour!  I told my sister about it and with one look she confirmed that this was in fact the same kid.  We didn't get an autograph or anything, but it was a bit of a "startstruck fanboy" moment nonetheless.
  • Guy who recognized my outfit - Ok, so last Christmas was possibly the fist time in my life that the coolest gift I got was clothes.  My amazing grandmother found the EXACT same style sweater and scarf that Mark Cohen wears in RENT.  AMAZING, RIGHT!?!  Anyway, I like to wear the whole ensemble (sometimes I wear glasses just for the heck of it) to theatrical events just to see if people will catch it.  Up until now, only one person has noticed it and said something (a cast member of Zombie Prom who had been in a production of RENT the previous year).  But this time while we were in our seats  and were commenting on seeing Zach behind us, the guy in front of me turned around and said, "excuse me, are you supposed to be Mark from RENT?"  LIFE WAS SUDDENLY BEAUTIFUL!  After telling him that the best I'd seen is both movies and a highschool production a few years back, he informed me that he'd seen it on Broadway 7 times!!  We reminisced for a while about how it's so incredibly awesome and he assured me that if there were ever a revival (one that was better than the recent Off-Broadway version) then I should do everything in my power to get myself to New York and see it.  We parted ways (not really, we stayed sitting down) contented in our mutual Broadway bond and proud of ourselves for finding fellow RENTheads to obsess with.
  • Mrs. S. - I suppose I should've seen this coming, but after the show I ran into an old drama teacher of mine.  Apparently she'd trained some of the Pebblebrook seniors (including Hamilton M.) and she came to see their final performance.  It shouldn't surprise me to have seen her there because she is definitely one of the best theater coaches in the area.  She's certainly very tough on her students and, at times, quite intimidating, but she expects excellence and, quite often, succeeds to produce it.
Conclusion
So, as I said earlier, although this wasn't my favorite of Pebblebrook's shows, it was really very delightful and I don't regret going for a second.  I now feel like I have a better understanding of the show and I understand it's message and depth much more now (the moral was kind of cut from the movie).  I'd recommend anyone go see "Little Shop" if they get a chance, but I'd INSIST that everyone go see a Pebblebrook show if they ever have such a wonderful opportunity.

I might not be posting again until the TONY nominations (seeing as this is the most busy time of year for me).  So, worst, case, I'll see you then.  Thanks for reading!